Public, non-traded

ABLF — AB Private Lending Fund

AB Private Lending Fund is a business development company managed by AllianceBernstein. Strategy: middle-market direct lending.

What SpreadVista tracks for ABLF

•Marks-to-par across the portfolio. Fair value as a fraction of par cost — the canonical health signal for a private-credit position — read from ABLF's own iXBRL tags and tracked quarter-over-quarter. A mark needs a par basis to exist, and ABLF reports one on 77.6% of the positions we serve; the rest (equity stakes, warrants, untagged principal) are shown without one rather than estimated.
•Top issuers by fair value. ABLF's concentration profile — the largest 10/25/50 exposures with mark and maturity context.
•Spread surface vs comparable BDCs. Where ABLF's positions sit on the credit-spread surface relative to peer-group BDCs holding similar credits, across the 99.1% of its positions that carry a tagged spread over a reference rate.
•Cross-vehicle issuer exposure. Which other BDCs and interval funds hold the same credits as ABLF — a contagion-risk view incumbents charge $20K–200K per seat for.

What we can't show for ABLF

SpreadVista only serves what the filer machine-tagged, and only computes a metric where there is enough of it to stand behind. Each item below is either under that bar for ABLF or something we could not tie to any individual position — the note says which. We leave them blank rather than infer them:

•Non-accrual status. We haven't tied a non-accrual disclosure to any individual ABLF position, so this page doesn't show a non-accrual view. That is not a finding that ABLF has none — a filer can disclose non-accruals in prose, or as a portfolio-level total our footnote reader can't attribute to a row. The positions we serve are shown as filed, with accrual status left unknown.
•NAV per share. We have no NAV-per-share observation for ABLF. Non-traded BDCs report NAV outside the tagged Schedule of Investments, so it doesn't reach us through the same pipeline as the positions.

See ABLF's full analytics

Free to research. Every ABLF position we serve, every cross-vehicle overlap — sourced directly from primary regulatory disclosures, with the methodology and the coverage gaps shown on every chart.

Get Free Access

About ABLF

Ticker: ABLF
Legal name: AB Private Lending Fund
Manager / Advisor: AllianceBernstein
Category: Public, non-traded
Strategy: Middle-market direct lending
Fiscal year end: 12-31
SEC CIK: 1982701 (Primary filings) (opens in new tab)

Related concepts

Plain-English explanations of the concepts behind BDC analysis:

What SpreadVista tracks for ABLF

•Marks-to-par across the portfolio. Fair value as a fraction of par cost — the canonical health signal for a private-credit position — read from ABLF's own iXBRL tags and tracked quarter-over-quarter. A mark needs a par basis to exist, and ABLF reports one on 77.6% of the positions we serve; the rest (equity stakes, warrants, untagged principal) are shown without one rather than estimated.

•Top issuers by fair value. ABLF's concentration profile — the largest 10/25/50 exposures with mark and maturity context.

•Spread surface vs comparable BDCs. Where ABLF's positions sit on the credit-spread surface relative to peer-group BDCs holding similar credits, across the 99.1% of its positions that carry a tagged spread over a reference rate.

•Cross-vehicle issuer exposure. Which other BDCs and interval funds hold the same credits as ABLF — a contagion-risk view incumbents charge $20K–200K per seat for.

What we can't show for ABLF

•Non-accrual status. We haven't tied a non-accrual disclosure to any individual ABLF position, so this page doesn't show a non-accrual view. That is not a finding that ABLF has none — a filer can disclose non-accruals in prose, or as a portfolio-level total our footnote reader can't attribute to a row. The positions we serve are shown as filed, with accrual status left unknown.

•NAV per share. We have no NAV-per-share observation for ABLF. Non-traded BDCs report NAV outside the tagged Schedule of Investments, so it doesn't reach us through the same pipeline as the positions.